9 States Banning Assault Weapons in 2026

This YouTube video, titled "10 Gun Laws Just Changed After December Court Ruling - Every Owner Must See This NOW!", discusses significant changes to firearm regulations following a recent court ruling. The creator, Luke from Line45, explains that judges are overturning long-standing gun laws, causing rapid shifts that are impacting states. The video aims to inform gun owners about these legal developments, detailing seven specific courtroom decisions that are challenging existing regulations and clarifying what states can no longer enforce.

This video discusses how online ammunition purchases can be tracked by federal agencies, creating a digital trail of gun owners' activities. The description highlights that seemingly simple transactions initiate a system that records personal information, purchase details, and delivery locations, ultimately forming a persistent digital shadow. The content aims to expose this hidden aspect of online ammo buying and its potential implications.

This video questions the true motivations behind California's DOJ gun show rules, suggesting a potential financial incentive rather than a genuine safety concern. The description points to the rules appearing suddenly, with their justification linked to an old incident. The CRPA's attorney speculates on government inefficiency or a financial driver for the timing, highlighting the importance of analyzing the fiscal impact.

This video analyzes the recent changes to California's Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) regulations following the passage of SB 2. It discusses how the Department of Justice (DOJ) implemented emergency rules without significant public input, and how these have now transitioned into formally adopted CCW regulations. The content focuses on the legal and regulatory landscape affecting firearm owners in California.

This video analyzes California's Senate Bill 2 (SB 2) and its impact on Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) classes. The bill not only established 'sensitive places' for CCW holders but also led to Department of Justice regulations concerning who can teach CCW courses. The content highlights ongoing litigation, with CRPA achieving successes on the 'sensitive places' aspect and the Wolford case currently before the Supreme Court. The primary focus is the developing controversy surrounding the qualifications and designation of CCW instructors.

This video discusses a court order barring the state from enforcing California's AB 2571. The description suggests the law has been deemed unconstitutional, likely due to an injunction from the Ninth Circuit. The content focuses on the legal implications, potentially for firearm owners in California, highlighting the Second Amendment rights and ongoing political and legal battles surrounding gun control legislation. The video implies the law will remain on the books as a 'dead letter' unless repealed or replaced by the legislature or voters.

This video discusses a recent filing by the Department of Justice (DOJ) that is perceived by the creator as a negative development for gun owners. The creator expresses surprise and concern, suggesting the DOJ's actions contradict previous pro-Second Amendment rhetoric. The video appears to analyze a specific legal development related to firearms, likely focusing on regulatory changes or interpretations impacting gun owners' rights. The creator uses strong language to convey the severity of the situation.

This video, titled "Every American NEED These Guns during War In 2025!", suggests that viewers should "stack up their arsenal" due to the current global geopolitical climate, which the creator believes could lead to mayhem. The creator emphasizes that the video is not intended to be fear-mongering but rather to point out perceived global instability. The description includes calls to action for likes and subscriptions, links to the creator's social media, and standard disclaimers regarding stock footage usage.

This video delves into the performance and historical significance of the .45 ACP cartridge, aiming to debunk myths and present modern statistics that may surprise 9mm enthusiasts. It highlights the enduring legacy of the .45 ACP as a trusted 'fight-stopper' and contrasts its capabilities with other calibers, particularly the popular 9mm.

This video challenges the dominance of the Glock 19, suggesting viewers might overlook it for several exciting new handgun models. The description highlights the Glock 19's established role in personal and home defense but pivots to introduce alternative firearms that could be considered 'next-level'. The video aims to present these new options as potentially superior or at least compelling alternatives to a widely recognized staple.

This video analyzes the statement made by Rep. Nancy Mace regarding a potential "bloodbath" in the midterms and explores why her prediction might be inaccurate. It delves into political commentary and analysis, touching upon election outcomes and voter sentiment without directly discussing firearms.

This video questions the true motivations behind California's DOJ gun show rules, suggesting a potential financial incentive rather than a genuine safety concern. The description points to the rules appearing suddenly, with their justification linked to an old incident. The CRPA's attorney speculates on government inefficiency or a financial driver for the timing, highlighting the importance of analyzing the fiscal impact.

This video appears to be a satirical take on gun control, using the hashtag #guncontrolnow multiple times and referencing gun violence awareness. The inclusion of #rdr2 suggests it might be related to the video game Red Dead Redemption 2, where players can interact with firearms. The satirical nature implies a commentary on gun control debates, potentially within a gaming context.

This video discusses a recent filing by the Department of Justice (DOJ) that is perceived by the creator as a negative development for gun owners. The creator expresses surprise and concern, suggesting the DOJ's actions contradict previous pro-Second Amendment rhetoric. The video appears to analyze a specific legal development related to firearms, likely focusing on regulatory changes or interpretations impacting gun owners' rights. The creator uses strong language to convey the severity of the situation.