This video analyzes a historic amicus brief filed by the U.S. Department of Justice supporting the Second Amendment in the Wolford v. Lopez case, challenging Hawaii's 'Vampire Rule'. Legal counsel Kostas Moros of Michel & Associates joins to discuss the brief's unprecedented nature, its potential impact on 'sensitive places' bans, California's SB2, and future Second Amendment litigation following the Bruen decision. The discussion also touches on how this could influence related cases like May v. Bonta, Duncan v. Bonta, and Snoe v. Raoul, and provides a timeline for expected outcomes. The CRPA's own amicus brief is highlighted, emphasizing the ongoing legal battle for Second Amendment rights.
This video analyzes a recent 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision impacting firearm carry rights in California, specifically referencing the SB2 "sensitive location" laws. The decision, related to the cases May v. Bonta and Carallero v. Bonta, is presented as a negative development for gun owners. The creator also promotes Attorneys on Retainer (AOR) with a discount code for viewers.
This video discusses the Ninth Circuit's split decision in the May v. Bonta case regarding "sensitive" locations under SB2. The court's new criteria for defining these locations are described as confusing. The Second Amendment Foundation (2AF) has requested an en banc rehearing of the case. The video also promotes Attorneys on Retainer, a constitution book, and the creator's merchandise, while emphasizing that the content is opinion-based and not legal advice.
This video discusses a recent 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision that largely upholds California's SB2 law, impacting firearm carry rights. The decision is presented as a setback for gun rights advocates, particularly concerning the "sensitive locations" provisions within the law. The content focuses on the legal implications of this ruling for citizens in California.
This video discusses the oral arguments in the May v. Bonta case heard by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The case challenges California's SB2 "Bruen Response Bill," specifically focusing on the "Sensitive Locations" provisions. The description indicates the oral arguments did not go well for gun rights advocates. The video also includes promotional content for Attorneys on Retainer, the creator's social media channels, and merchandise. A disclaimer explicitly states the content is not legal advice and is for educational and entertainment purposes only.
This video discusses a positive development for gun owners in California, where the NRA has reportedly intervened to help address SB2 restrictions. Specifically, the CA DOJ is proposing regulations that would allow NRA instructors to conduct CCW training, making it more accessible for individuals to obtain their concealed carry permits. Additionally, the video touches upon the striking down of firearms purchase limits, referencing the Nguyen v. Bonta case.
This video discusses new emergency regulations from the DOJ concerning SB2, with a focus on their implications for firearm owners. It outlines the events leading up to these regulations, goes through the official documentation, and explores the process for potentially rolling them back. The content encourages viewers to submit comments on the regulations and highlights the importance of fighting for gun rights. Sponsorships from CCW Safe and The Police Credit Union are also featured.
This video discusses a victory for the CRPA (California Rifle and Pistol Association) in a lawsuit that has reportedly led to the return of gun shows. It touches upon answering potential questions attendees might have at such events, provides an update on "1384," and analyzes the consequences of lawsuits related to "SB2," also mentioning Governor Gavin Newsom. The CRPA encourages viewers to join their organization to continue their fight for gun rights and mentions a partnership with The Police Credit Union (PCU).
This video discusses a legal development concerning SB2 legislation, specifically a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision that reinstated an injunction on "sensitive locations." The injunction, previously lifted by a "Motions" panel, was reimposed by a "Merits" panel, halting the enforcement of a significant part of SB2. The Governor's response to this ruling is the primary focus of the content. The video also includes disclaimers about not being legal counsel and emphasizes that content is for educational and entertainment purposes.
This YouTube video announces a significant legal victory concerning SB2 legislation, which is a firearm-related law. The content promises to delve into the details of this legislation and explore ongoing litigation surrounding it. Viewers are encouraged to subscribe for updates and discussions. Links are provided for relevant legal documents, the CRPA ( a gun rights organization), and PCU membership, indicating a strong focus on Second Amendment advocacy and legal battles.
This YouTube video discusses the implications of a new law (SB2) concerning carrying firearms in public spaces, particularly in sensitive locations. The title suggests a shift in what is considered permissible for gun owners to carry their firearms. The content likely delves into the legal aspects and practical consequences of this legislative update for individuals who carry guns for self-defense or other purposes.
This YouTube video discusses a legal development in California concerning the carrying of firearms in public spaces. It highlights a ruling by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that blocked a law, SB2, from taking effect. This law, signed by Governor Gavin Newsom, would have prohibited individuals with concealed carry permits from bringing firearms into 26 types of public locations, including parks, stadiums, hospitals, and houses of worship. The video aims to educate viewers on the implications of this legal update.
