This YouTube Short compares the ballistic performance of vintage Ballistic Nylon, originally used in WWII flak jackets, against modern body armor materials. The description highlights that Ballistic Nylon, still found in items like luggage and tool belts, has been largely superseded by advanced materials like Kevlar in ballistic applications. The video aims to showcase the performance difference through testing and encourages viewers to visit predatorarmor.com for modern body armor solutions. The content also touches on military history and tactical gear.
This video, "Ceramic and Steel Body Armor vs. Spalling," aims to determine which material better handles shrapnel. While no specific firearms or calibers are mentioned, the context of body armor and spalling strongly implies ballistic testing and a focus on personal protection. The description also highlights GUNBROS as a family-owned business providing battle-tested, industry-trusted products for self-defense and protection, emphasizing Second Amendment freedoms.
This video tests the ballistic performance of Ballistic Nylon, a material historically used in flak jackets and still found in items like luggage and tool belts. While acknowledging its past significance, the description notes that more advanced materials like Kevlar have replaced it in modern ballistic protection. The video aims to compare Ballistic Nylon's performance against contemporary materials, encouraging viewers to check out the results. A link to Predator Armor for body armor is provided.
This video tackles the common misconception that steel body armor is excessively heavy. It aims to debunk this myth by comparing steel and ceramic armor options, highlighting that advancements in steel armor technology have made it thinner and lighter than many believe. The description emphasizes that there's a wide variety of armor on the market, and contrary to popular opinion, many ceramic options can actually be heavier than their steel counterparts. The video encourages viewers to check out www.predatorarmor.com for tactical gear.
This video compares the protective capabilities of hard versus soft body armor when applied to a human torso. The comparison aims to demonstrate the differences in protection offered by each type of armor, highlighting the potential damage from ballistic impacts. The description also includes affiliate links for various products and channels, including Scheels, Premier Body Armor, Ballistic Dummy Lab, and AXIL ear protection, as well as links to camera gear and Patreon/PayPal for channel support.
This YouTube video features a ballistic test comparing the performance of a Level III+ armor plate against a .300 Winchester Magnum (Win Mag) round. The video, presented by Predator Armor, aims to determine if their specific Level III+ plate can withstand this powerful rifle caliber. Viewers are encouraged to visit the Predator Armor website for purchasing information.
This video from Administrative Results compares the effectiveness of AR500 steel armor against Level 4 ceramic body armor. The creator uses "shotty science" methods to test which armor will offer better protection, with AR500 providing a curved plate with extra spall protection. The Level 4 ceramic armor is from the creator's personal collection. The video also highlights the firearms used for testing and showcases the results of the armor comparison.
This video compares steel and ceramic ballistic plates, questioning the common perception that steel plates are ineffective. The description highlights that quality ceramic plates are now affordable, diminishing the argument for steel. It also points out the weight and potential danger of steel plates without proper spalling protection. The video aims to investigate whether steel plates are as bad as often portrayed online.
This video directly compares ceramic and steel body armor plates in a hands-on test. The creator acknowledges some testing limitations, such as not placing the plates in a carrier and an unintentional misstatement of the term 'spalling' (referring to it as 'sprawling'). Despite these minor issues, the video aims to provide practical insights for viewers considering different body armor options. Links to specific products tested, along with discount codes and the creator's social media and merchandise, are provided.
This YouTube video pits steel against ceramic body armor, aiming to separate fact from fiction regarding their performance. The content likely involves ballistic testing and analysis of different armor types. The video is presented by RTT: Guns & Gear, which focuses on firearm-related content and tactical gear, as indicated by their social media links and mention of specific brands like Werkz Holster and Gatorz Glasses. The content is presented for educational purposes.
This video compares steel versus composite armor, discussing their pros and cons. Steel armor is presented as an affordable option with some drawbacks, while composite armor is highlighted as more expensive but lighter and more effective. The video emphasizes that it is recorded on a private range under professional supervision and includes disclaimers about not attempting the demonstrations at home, stating that all work should be performed by a trained professional. The content is strictly for educational and entertainment purposes, and viewers are warned about imitation at their own risk.
This video from VSO Gun Channel compares three types of body armor: plastic, ceramic, and steel. The channel, operating as an educational resource and testing lab, emphasizes objective content and responsible gun ownership. While the video's description was impacted by a data loss, VSO provides a linktr.ee for affiliate links and encourages inquiries about their testing and consulting services. The content focuses on evaluating the effectiveness and characteristics of different armor materials for potential use.
