This YouTube video, titled "Projétil M855 (5,56 mm) VS Colete de Aço – O Que Acontece no Impacto?" (M855 Projectile (5.56mm) VS Steel Body Armor - What Happens on Impact?), likely explores the penetration capabilities of M855 ammunition against steel body armor. The title explicitly mentions the caliber and projectile type, and the comparison aspect suggests a test or demonstration focusing on the outcome of this specific ballistic event. The content is expected to be of interest to individuals interested in firearms, ballistics, and personal protection.
This YouTube video from @thearmoredrepublic investigates the phenomenon of steel armor spalling. Spalling refers to the fragmentation of projectiles or armor plating upon impact. The video aims to clarify myths surrounding this topic, likely involving live fire demonstrations or material analysis to understand how different types of steel armor react to various ammunition. The content appears to be geared towards individuals interested in ballistics, armor penetration, and the practical performance of defensive materials.
This video, "Ceramic and Steel Body Armor vs. Spalling," aims to determine which material better handles shrapnel. While no specific firearms or calibers are mentioned, the context of body armor and spalling strongly implies ballistic testing and a focus on personal protection. The description also highlights GUNBROS as a family-owned business providing battle-tested, industry-trusted products for self-defense and protection, emphasizing Second Amendment freedoms.
This video from InRange TV tests the effectiveness of AR500 steel armor against the M855A1 ammunition. The description clarifies that while M855A1 is not officially designated as an AP round, it possesses AP-like qualities and is considered ball ammunition by technical standards. The content aims to determine if steel armor is superior to ceramic, as claimed by an AR500 company.
This video likely focuses on the effectiveness and survivability of steel body armor, as indicated by the title "STEEL Body Armor WON’T Kill You (with tests)". The inclusion of terms like '#civtac' and '#tactical' suggests a focus on civilian tactical applications and gear. The mention of '#gun' implies a connection to firearms, possibly in the context of ballistic protection against them. The tests will likely demonstrate the armor's ability to stop projectiles without catastrophic failure, addressing a common concern about fragmentation or spalling.
This YouTube video, titled "DIFFERENT Coatings? (Steel Body Armor) #civtac #tactical #edc", focuses on steel body armor, likely exploring various coating options. The hashtags suggest a connection to civilian tactical applications and everyday carry (EDC) preparedness. While no specific firearms are mentioned, the context implies a discussion relevant to individuals interested in personal protection and tactical gear.
This video tackles the common misconception that steel body armor is excessively heavy. It aims to debunk this myth by comparing steel and ceramic armor options, highlighting that advancements in steel armor technology have made it thinner and lighter than many believe. The description emphasizes that there's a wide variety of armor on the market, and contrary to popular opinion, many ceramic options can actually be heavier than their steel counterparts. The video encourages viewers to check out www.predatorarmor.com for tactical gear.
This video discusses steel body armor and its primary drawback, spall and fragmentation. It presents Kevlar as the solution, explaining how it's used to wrap steel plates to effectively catch and contain spall, thereby enhancing safety. The product is available for purchase at www.predatorarmor.com.
This video explores the ballistic capabilities of steel armor plates against a 20mm round. It references Grip6 for their armor products and Rts tactical. The channel of Mark Serbu is also linked, suggesting a potential comparison or demonstration involving his expertise or products. The focus is on testing the penetration resistance of steel armor against a high-caliber threat.
This video tests the durability of AR650 steel body armor by running it over with a truck. The description emphasizes that AR650 steel is not fragile and highlights Predator Armor's Level III+ body armor, manufactured in the USA. The armor utilizes a unique heat-treating process for superior ballistic properties, allowing for thinner, lighter, and impact-resistant plates. The video aims to debunk myths about steel armor's fragility and promote the strength and effectiveness of Predator Armor products.
This video tests and compares RTS Tactical Level IV Ceramic Armor Plates against other ballistic options, specifically Level III+ Steel Armor Plates. The testing involves using high-powered rifle ammunition. The presenter poses the question of whether ceramic or steel is the better choice for body armor needs, encouraging viewer engagement with a poll. Links to both ceramic and steel armor are provided, along with affiliate links for Axil ear protection and an Amazon storefront. The video emphasizes that all shooting is conducted on a private range under controlled conditions and does not sell firearms or ammunition.
This video showcases the future of steel body armor, emphasizing its availability today. It highlights specific products from a company that specializes in steel targets, offering a discount code for their Exodus Steel Target line and a link to their full range of target systems. The content appears to be promotional, aiming to drive sales of their body armor and steel targets.
