This YouTube video from @thearmoredrepublic investigates the phenomenon of steel armor spalling. Spalling refers to the fragmentation of projectiles or armor plating upon impact. The video aims to clarify myths surrounding this topic, likely involving live fire demonstrations or material analysis to understand how different types of steel armor react to various ammunition. The content appears to be geared towards individuals interested in ballistics, armor penetration, and the practical performance of defensive materials.
This video title suggests a ballistic test comparing rifle spalling (fragmentation of a projectile upon impact) against a Level III ballistic helmet. The core question is whether the helmet can withstand the fragments generated by a rifle round. The content likely involves a demonstration or analysis of projectile behavior and personal protective equipment's resistance capabilities. It aims to inform viewers about the effectiveness of Level III armor against rifle-induced fragmentation.
This video, "Ceramic and Steel Body Armor vs. Spalling," aims to determine which material better handles shrapnel. While no specific firearms or calibers are mentioned, the context of body armor and spalling strongly implies ballistic testing and a focus on personal protection. The description also highlights GUNBROS as a family-owned business providing battle-tested, industry-trusted products for self-defense and protection, emphasizing Second Amendment freedoms.
This video tests the penetration capabilities of M855 "Green Tip" 5.56mm ammunition against steel body armor, investigating the phenomenon of spalling. The title also hints at a "Full Auto Friday" theme and includes the hashtag #civtac, suggesting a focus on civilian tactical applications or advanced firearm testing. The analysis aims to extract relevant tags based on firearms, calibers, and tactical topics discussed or implied.
This video directly compares the effectiveness of a Level III helmet against rifle spalling. It investigates whether the helmet can stop fragments generated from rifle rounds impacting a surface. The content aims to provide practical information for individuals interested in ballistic protection and the performance of protective gear against common rifle threats. The `#civtac` and `#demolitionranch` hashtags suggest a focus on civilian tactical applications and a potentially experimental or demonstrative approach to testing.
This video from Demo Ranch tests the ballistic protection of tactical sunglasses, specifically examining their resistance to spalling. The content focuses on a practical, real-world application of gear in a firearms context, likely involving live fire to demonstrate the effectiveness of the eyewear against ricochets or fragments. The title and hashtags suggest a focus on safety and performance of specialized equipment for firearm users.
This video compares steel and ceramic ballistic plates, questioning the common perception that steel plates are ineffective. The description highlights that quality ceramic plates are now affordable, diminishing the argument for steel. It also points out the weight and potential danger of steel plates without proper spalling protection. The video aims to investigate whether steel plates are as bad as often portrayed online.
This video directly compares ceramic and steel body armor plates in a hands-on test. The creator acknowledges some testing limitations, such as not placing the plates in a carrier and an unintentional misstatement of the term 'spalling' (referring to it as 'sprawling'). Despite these minor issues, the video aims to provide practical insights for viewers considering different body armor options. Links to specific products tested, along with discount codes and the creator's social media and merchandise, are provided.
This video explains the phenomenon of spalling when shooting steel targets, specifically AR500 targets from shootsteel.com. The presenter, Eric from IV8888, demonstrates what spalling is and emphasizes crucial safety considerations to protect the shooter, bystanders, and property. It also includes links to affiliate stores, Patreon, and the IV8888 website.
This video from Pew Pew Tactical rigorously tests AR500 Armor's ballistic plates against a variety of threats, including armor-piercing rounds. The content explains NIJ threat levels, distinguishes between soft armor (Level 3A) and steel plates (Level 3, 3+, Level 4 ceramic composite), and discusses different plate cuts (shooter's cut, advanced shooter's cut) for mobility and coverage. It also covers the importance of curved plates with Paxcon coating for comfort and spall protection. The review concludes by recommending a specific Level III+ Lightweight Plate and reviewing several AR500 Armor plate carrier models, offering viewers insights to choose the right body armor for their needs.
This video from Fun Gun Reviews showcases a ballistic plate shooting test of AR500 Armor plates. The test examines fragmentation and spalling by firing various calibers at both untreated and Line-X coated AR500 plates. The review highlights the performance of the ballistic plates under different ammunition impacts, offering a practical evaluation of their protective capabilities.
You've reached the end! 11 videos loaded.