This video title suggests a ballistic test comparing rifle spalling (fragmentation of a projectile upon impact) against a Level III ballistic helmet. The core question is whether the helmet can withstand the fragments generated by a rifle round. The content likely involves a demonstration or analysis of projectile behavior and personal protective equipment's resistance capabilities. It aims to inform viewers about the effectiveness of Level III armor against rifle-induced fragmentation.
This video features a ballistic test pitting a Level 3 Danish ballistic helmet against a .300 Blackout round to determine which prevails. The content creator emphasizes that their opinions are their own, despite the items being provided by mentioned brands for the video's production. This comparison highlights the protective capabilities of tactical gear against rifle calibers.
This video directly compares the effectiveness of a Level III helmet against rifle spalling. It investigates whether the helmet can stop fragments generated from rifle rounds impacting a surface. The content aims to provide practical information for individuals interested in ballistic protection and the performance of protective gear against common rifle threats. The `#civtac` and `#demolitionranch` hashtags suggest a focus on civilian tactical applications and a potentially experimental or demonstrative approach to testing.
This video appears to be a comparison or demonstration focusing on the effectiveness of a PUBG Level 3 helmet against a grenade, with a specific mention of DEVTAC. The provided link suggests DEVTAC is a manufacturer of tactical gear, possibly related to helmets. The hashtags indicate a connection to the game PUBG and the specific gear item. While the core content isn't directly about real-world firearms, the association with tactical gear and the context of 'Level 3 helmet' implies a potential overlap with the tactical and preparedness community.
You've reached the end! 4 videos loaded.
