This video from CRPA TV, recorded at SHOT Show 2025, features a discussion with Michael D. Cargill about his legal challenge, Cargill v. USA, concerning bump stocks and the Chevron Doctrine. The conversation delves into how the ATF's stance on bump stocks has been impacted by the Chevron Doctrine and the ongoing legal fight. The video also promotes CRPA membership and its sponsors, CCW Safe and Police Credit Union.
This video features a second amendment attorney breaking down the oral arguments at the Supreme Court in Vanderstok v. Garland, a case challenging an ATF rule on ghost guns. The discussion covers the definition of ghost guns, the plaintiffs' arguments, differing legal standards, the significance of the Chevron Doctrine, and the potential implications of the ruling for California. The video also includes calls to action for viewers to support the CRPA and mentions sponsors like CCW Safe and Police Credit Union.
This video discusses a major legal development in the Vanderstok v. Garland "ghost gun" case before the Supreme Court. The Biden administration's DOJ and ATF are criticized for repeatedly citing their own prior conduct and interpretations to justify new regulations, a tactic deemed convenient and absurd by the presenter, Mark Smith. The analysis highlights how the government allegedly uses its own previous actions as precedent, potentially undermining fair legal process. The video also touches on the Chevron Doctrine's relevance to the case and encourages viewers to understand the "four boxes" of American liberty.
This video discusses the recent SCOTUS decision to overturn the Chevron Doctrine and its potential impact on federal agencies, particularly the ATF. The host emphasizes how this ruling could limit the power of federal agencies in interpreting and enforcing regulations, which they believe is a significant win for gun rights. The video encourages viewers to join the CRPA to support ongoing legal battles and highlights sponsors offering self-defense coverage and financial services.
This video discusses the implications of the Supreme Court's Loper Bright case decision, which eliminated the Chevron Doctrine. The host, Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner, explains how this ruling significantly complicates operations for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). Smith, a constitutional attorney and frequent Fox News guest, leverages his expertise to provide an analysis of the Second Amendment implications and the "four boxes" of American liberty.
This video discusses a significant Supreme Court ruling that strikes down the Chevron Doctrine, a legal principle that gave deference to federal agency interpretations of laws. The presenter, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, argues this ruling is a major win for Americans and a setback for the executive branch, aligning the country more closely with the founders' intentions. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on the implications of this decision for their Second Amendment rights and provides contact information for legal advice.
This video discusses a significant Supreme Court ruling that strikes down the unconstitutional Chevron Doctrine. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith from Four Boxes Diner explains how this 6-3 decision curtails the broad powers of administrative agencies and the regulatory state. The content emphasizes the importance of understanding the 'four boxes' of American liberty (soap box, ballot box, jury box, and ammunition box) for defending individual rights, particularly focusing on Second Amendment news and analysis.
This video analyzes a significant US Supreme Court decision that overturned the ATF's bump stock ban. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, a Supreme Court Bar member and frequent Fox News guest, breaks down the ruling, labeling it a "devastating opinion" and a "major victory for the right to bear arms." The discussion touches on the Chevron Doctrine, distinctions between machine guns and semi-automatic firearms, and perceived mistakes by anti-gun advocates. The content is presented as "hot, fresh Second Amendment news and analysis" from "The Four Boxes Diner."
This video provides an analysis of upcoming US Supreme Court cases that could significantly impact various aspects of American law. Host Mark Smith discusses key cases concerning the Chevron Doctrine, Trump's immunity, the First Amendment (NetChoice), Second Amendment rights (Rahimi), immigration (Moyle v. United States), the January 6th Capitol riot, NRA and SEC matters, the mifepristone abortion pill, bump stocks (Cargill), social media pressure (Murthy v. Missouri), and homelessness and the Eighth Amendment. Smith, a constitutional attorney, offers his predictions on the outcomes.
This video discusses a potential leak from the Supreme Court regarding a significant ATF-related case concerning the Chevron doctrine. Justice Brown Jackson's statement during oral arguments is highlighted as a potential indicator of the upcoming ruling's outcome. The content is presented by Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner, who provides analysis from a constitutional attorney's perspective, touching on Second Amendment rights and the "four boxes" of American liberty.
This video features William Kirk of Washington Gun Law discussing the Supreme Court case Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimando and its potential impact on the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). While the case originates from fishing industry regulations, its core issue is the constitutionality of the Chevron Doctrine, a legal principle widely used by the ATF for its enforcement actions, including the bump stock ban. The video aims to educate viewers on the significance of this case for Second Amendment rights.
This video from Four Boxes Diner, featuring constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, outlines the key Second Amendment cases the 2A community should be closely watching during the 2023-2024 US Supreme Court term. Smith details specific desired outcomes, including the reversal of the bumpstock ban and the embracement of robust due process, the Chevron doctrine's removal, and the rule of lenity. The content leverages Smith's expertise as a Supreme Court Bar member and frequent media commentator to provide in-depth analysis for gun owners.
