This video analyzes the Ninth Circuit's decision in Roe v. Bonta, a California ammunition background check case. It discusses the court's vote for en banc rehearing, which vacated a previous pro-Second Amendment ruling. CRPA President Chuck Michel explains the implications of this decision, the state's motivations, and how the Bruen framework applies. The video also touches on the Ninth Circuit's history of alleged bias, the broader national impact on ammunition laws, and upcoming related cases like Duncan v. Bonta, highlighting the stakes for California gun owners and the potential reshaping of Second Amendment law on the West Coast.
This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, providing a detailed analysis of the Supreme Court's recent orders list. The primary focus is to identify any developments concerning Second Amendment cases that were on conference. The video encourages viewers to join in this 'geeking out' session over coffee to start the week informed about legal proceedings relevant to gun rights.
This video discusses the concerning stance of some police unions against the Second Amendment and their push to stop HR38. The presenter emphasizes that the mere possession of a firearm should not be a basis for police investigation, detention, or seizure, citing the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The video also highlights the utility of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for gun owners to protect their constitutional rights against potential police overreach. It includes calls to action to support pro-Second Amendment organizations and mentions products from "Blackout Coffee" and "Guns & Gadgets gear."
This video from Line45 discusses a recent legal development in Massachusetts that is claimed to be a direct challenge to the Second Amendment. The creator, Luke, argues that the state is openly defying the Supreme Court's stance on gun rights, framing this as a significant legal battle that could have nationwide implications for 2A protections. The content aims to inform viewers about the case, its potential consequences for their rights, and its importance in the ongoing fight for gun rights.
This video discusses how restraining orders in California can be misused to disarm innocent gun owners. It highlights real-life cases where minor disputes, like one over security cameras, have led to significant firearm bans. The content emphasizes the importance of due process and argues that the current system punishes law-abiding citizens rather than protecting victims, advocating for fairness in California's gun laws.
This video delves into a new California law that links restraining orders to concealed carry weapon (CCW) permits. Attorney Chuck Michel explains how this legislation can complicate the CCW process, potentially stripping individuals of their firearm rights without their knowledge. The discussion highlights concerns about due process, legislative oversight, and the potential for abuse, particularly when lawmakers may not fully grasp constitutional implications. The content focuses on the legal and political aspects affecting gun ownership rights in California.
This video discusses the historical and ongoing efforts to disarm Americans, focusing on how felony convictions can lead to lifetime firearm bans, regardless of the nature of the offense. Washington Gun Law President William Kirk highlights the impact of these laws, particularly from the perspective of public defenders. The discussion centers on a significant case before the U.S. Supreme Court that could potentially restore Second Amendment rights for millions. The video also promotes "Right to Bear," a self-defense protection service, and encourages viewers to engage with Washington Gun Law through their newsletter, website, and social media channels.
This video discusses the US Supreme Court case *US v. Harris*, which challenges federal law 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3), prohibiting marijuana users from owning firearms. CRPA President Chuck Michel breaks down the case, its distinction from *US v. Hemani*, and its potential impact on how the government defines "prohibited persons." The discussion touches upon the historical context of gun ownership, legal buyers, the 4473 form, and broader Second Amendment litigation, including *Duncan v. Bonta*. The video also highlights CRPA's advocacy for both law enforcement and cannabis user rights, and the Supreme Court's process for reviewing cases.
This video discusses new gun bans in California and the legal challenges being mounted by the CRPA (California Rifle & Pistol Association). It highlights that the fight for Second Amendment rights intensifies after restrictive laws are passed. The CRPA is preparing lawsuits against specific California laws, including a "three guns a month" limit and new barrel restrictions, emphasizing that the courtroom is the next key battleground for gun rights.
This video from GOA discusses the Supreme Court's decision to take up the Wolford v. Lopez case, which is considered the most significant gun rights case since Bruen. The GOA highlights their role in creating a circuit split that led to this Supreme Court review. The case aims to clarify misinterpretations of the Bruen decision and hold lower courts accountable for their rulings. The video, presented on "Law & Ammo," delves into the specifics of Wolford v. Lopez and its implications for the future of the Second Amendment, encouraging viewers to support GOA.
This YouTube video focuses on an investigation by CBS News Chicago that reveals instances where legally armed Black individuals in Chicago were charged with felonies despite possessing valid Firearm Owner's Identification (FOID) cards and concealed carry licenses. The investigation highlights that these charges often stemmed from minor traffic violations. The video features interviews with one of the victims, Luis, and Philip Smith, President of NAAGA, to discuss these occurrences and their implications for gun owners.
This video discusses a lawsuit filed in New Hampshire, Harrington v. Crawford, where a public school allegedly conducted a forcible, non-consensual search of a student's car simply because the student owned a firearm. Washington Gun Law President William Kirk explains that the lawsuit aims to establish that the school district violated the student's constitutional rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. The focus of the legal action is to obtain a court declaration of unlawful conduct, rather than monetary damages or injunctions, emphasizing the importance of education on such legal matters.
