Videos tagged with District Court

This video discusses a significant legal challenge to mandatory firearm waiting periods, with 28 states joining a district court case to advocate for their removal. The title "BREAKING NOW: 28 States Tell District Court To DESTROY Mandatory Waiting Periods... Let's GO" suggests a strong stance against these regulations and implies a call to action or expression of support for the legal effort. The description reiterates the breaking news aspect and promotes a "Libertist" t-shirt related to rights.

This video discusses a significant legal development where a District Court Judge ruled the National Firearms Act (NFA) unconstitutional as applied to a specific defendant. The description promotes various firearm-related brands and organizations, including Vortex, Viktos, AR15.com, and gun rights advocacy groups like SAF, Gun Owners of America, Firearms Policy Coalition, National Association for Gun Rights, and CCRKBA. The content appears to focus on the legal challenges and implications of gun control legislation.

This video discusses a recent court ruling in California (CRPA v. LASD) mandating the state to begin issuing non-resident concealed carry permits. The judge has given California approximately one month to establish a plan for this process. While this decision does not force reciprocity with permits issued by other states, it is presented as a significant step forward for gun rights advocates.

This video from the VSO Gun Channel discusses a legal victory by the Firearm Policy Coalition (FPC) against New Jersey's concealed carry restrictions. The district court ruled the state's laws unconstitutional, which the FPC views as a significant win. The description emphasizes VSO's role as an educational resource promoting responsible gun ownership and safety, clarifying their business model does not involve selling firearms.

This video discusses a Federal District Court Judge in New York upholding a new state law, which the uploader believes is unconstitutional and a "destruction" of the Second Amendment. The judge's reasoning, citing a 1756 law concerning Catholics, is highlighted as a questionable historical analog. The content also includes a promotional plug for "Attorneys on Retainer" and links to the creator's social media and merchandise.

This video discusses a federal district court's denial of a case brought by California. The content highlights a judge's adherence to the Bruen decision, suggesting it is the guiding precedent for gun rights. The description emphasizes the ongoing fight for these rights and encourages viewers to join the CRPA (California Rifle and Pistol Association) and PCU (Police Credit Union). The video's structure includes an intro, discussions on the judge's reasoning and the defendants' failed analogies, and concluding remarks.

This video provides an update on the legal case Baird v. Bonta, which challenges California's ban on open carry of firearms. The description highlights the ongoing, multi-year legal battle that has moved between the District Court and the 9th Circuit. The content creator also promotes privacy services with a discount code, their merchandise, and includes disclaimers about not being a lawyer and that the content is for educational and entertainment purposes only, with a strong caution against imitation. The video is presented by Copper Jacket TV.

This video discusses a federal district court judge's decision to uphold an "assault weapon" ban in Cook County, Illinois. The judge ruled that these firearms do not fall under constitutional protection. The case was brought forth by the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and 2AAdvocates (2AF). The content creator clarifies they are not a lawyer and this is their opinion, with disclaimers about not being legal advice and that any actions seen in their videos should not be attempted at home.

This video covers breaking Second Amendment news, specifically a legal challenge against New York's assault weapon ban. A US District Court judge in the Southern District of New York denied the state's motion to dismiss the case, allowing the legal challenge to proceed. The content features constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, discussing the plaintiff's standing argument and offering his predictions on potential outcomes. Smith emphasizes understanding the 'four boxes' of American liberty to defend individual rights.

This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, discussing a significant Supreme Court ruling on the ATF's rule regarding frames and receivers. The ruling in Vanderstock v. Garland, which challenges the ATF's definition, saw the Supreme Court intervene to uphold the rule, despite prior victories for the plaintiffs in lower courts. Kirk explores the implications of this emergency action and encourages viewers to educate themselves on their Second Amendment rights. Contact information for Washington Gun Law and a link to the case docket are provided.

This video discusses the immediate fallout from a recent District Court ruling by Judge Ingergut, which upheld a stringent gun control law in Oregon as constitutional. The title and description suggest that while the ruling might be seen as a win for gun control advocates, it could have unintended negative consequences for them, potentially painting them into a corner. The content aims to analyze the legal and political ramifications of this decision for gun rights.

This YouTube video discusses a significant legal development concerning firearm accessories. A district court judge in the Northern District of Texas has issued a preliminary injunction against the ATF, ruling in favor of the Second Amendment Foundation and other plaintiffs regarding pistol braces. The video references a related case, Mock v Garland, and provides links to the creator's other platforms and services, including a podcast and affiliate discounts. The creator emphasizes their role as an educational resource focused on responsible gun ownership and safety, clarifying they are not involved in selling firearms.