This video discusses a significant 9-0 unanimous Supreme Court decision with nationwide implications. The content creator, a licensed attorney, clarifies that the video does not offer legal guidance. The description also includes social media links and details about the creator's YouTube setup, as well as an affiliate disclaimer.
This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, providing a legal analysis of former FBI Director James Comey's tweet. Kirk discusses the potential legal ramifications of the tweet, specifically referencing 18 U.S. Code § 871, which pertains to threats against the President. The video aims to educate viewers on the legal aspects of such actions and encourages audience participation in discussing potential consequences for Mr. Comey. It also promotes the services and resources of Washington Gun Law.
This video features an interview with Wade, who recounts his harrowing experience of surviving a self-defense shooting and facing a life sentence in prison. He details the events leading up to the incident, the subsequent legal battle that lasted nearly five years, and the profound emotional impact of fighting for his freedom. Wade emphasizes the critical importance of understanding self-defense laws and how quickly legal situations can escalate, sharing practical advice for both defense during an encounter and navigating the courtroom. The interview offers a raw and realistic perspective on the consequences of self-defense incidents, highlighting aspects rarely seen in fictional portrayals and what every gun owner should know.
This video discusses the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals denying an En Banc review for the May v. Bonta case. CRPA President Chuck Michel provides insights and analysis, especially from his presence at Shot Show. The discussion touches on the evolution of Second Amendment law and what the next steps might be in the legal fight. The video encourages viewers to join CRPA to support their ongoing efforts.
This YouTube video, titled 'Talk To A Lawyer,' focuses on the recent drone sightings over the East Coast. The description promises a 'fun and exciting episode' with new information. A link to the full episode is provided. While the title and description do not directly mention firearms, the act of discussing sensitive topics or potentially legal ramifications of such events could indirectly relate to the Second Amendment or preparedness discussions, which often intersect with firearm ownership and use. However, without further context from the video itself, the direct relevance to firearms content is minimal.
This YouTube Short features Jeff Young, a legal expert, discussing questions related to firearm ownership and law. The video is presented as a continuation of a podcast, indicating an educational and informative approach to complex legal issues surrounding firearms. The content is primarily focused on the legal aspects of owning firearms and is tagged with relevant legal and constitutional themes.
This YouTube Shorts video features legal expert Jeff Young discussing who qualifies as a "Prohibited Person" under firearm law. The short format suggests a concise explanation of legal definitions and implications for gun ownership, with a focus on the Second Amendment and legal counsel.
This video features Jeff Young returning to a podcast to discuss legal matters related to firearms following a Baker Act. The discussion aims to answer questions regarding firearm rights and how they can be restored after such an event, with an emphasis on legal procedures and constitutional protections. The content appears to be geared towards individuals seeking information on Second Amendment rights and legal recourse.
This YouTube Short features Jeff Young, a 2nd Amendment lawyer, discussing the process of restoring an individual's gun rights after they have been revoked. He emphasizes the necessity of filing the correct paperwork with the state that issued the rights restriction. The video highlights the legal aspects of firearm ownership and the steps involved in regaining Second Amendment rights.
This video discusses the oral arguments in the Rhode v. Bonta case before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The description highlights surprising arguments made by the judges, suggesting a potentially significant legal development concerning gun rights. It references the history of the case, ancillary rights, facial challenges versus as-applied challenges, and a specific mention of "Footnote 9." The video encourages viewers to join the CRPA and promotes CCW Safe and the Police Credit Union as sponsors. It also provides a link to the full oral argument.
This video provides a deep dive into a new opinion from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals concerning "sensitive places" regulations. It breaks down the court's reasoning, what was gained and lost in the ruling, and discusses a specific "Vampire Rule." The content emphasizes the ongoing fight for Second Amendment rights and encourages viewers to join the CRPA. It also highlights sponsors offering relevant services for gun owners.
This YouTube video features Jeff Young, a lawyer specializing in firearms law, answering viewer questions to clarify gun regulations. The Q&A aims to reduce confusion surrounding legal aspects of firearm ownership and usage. The video promotes the #2ndamendment and uses the popular #lawyer and #pewpew hashtags.
