This video analyzes a recent legal decision concerning firearm regulations. It breaks down a ruling that struck down a state rifle ban while upholding a magazine ban, referencing the Supreme Court's latest precedents. The description highlights an unexpected early intervention by an En Banc panel in the "assault weapon" and magazine ban legal battle. The content aims to inform viewers about the evolving legal landscape surrounding these firearm restrictions.
This video discusses the legal case Rhode v. Bonta and its potential impact on California's ammunition background check law. It analyzes the Ninth Circuit's en banc panel, the political dynamics of the court, and the implications of a potential win for gun owners. The discussion also covers the history of the 2016 ammo law, the potential expansion of the 11% ammo tax (AB 28), and legal questions surrounding out-of-state sales. The video encourages viewers to support the CRPA and stay informed about this critical case.
This video discusses a significant legal development regarding AR-15 bans, specifically the US Court of Appeals, Third Circuit's decision to hear an AR-15 ban case En Banc. The content features legal scholar Mark W. Smith, host of the Four Boxes Diner 2A channel, known for his constitutional law expertise and advocacy for Second Amendment rights. Smith has authored several books on gun rights and his scholarship has influenced legal arguments, including a federal judge's ruling against an "assault weapon" ban. The discussion likely centers on the legal challenges to firearm restrictions and their implications for gun owners' liberties.
This video discusses the legal battle surrounding California's ammunition background check law (Prop 63) following a defeat for the state in the Rhode v. Bonta case. California has filed for an en banc review at the Ninth Circuit, aiming to overturn a recent victory for Second Amendment advocates. CRPA President Chuck Michel breaks down the state's legal strategy, the Ninth Circuit's political landscape, and the potential national impact on gun owners and Second Amendment litigation. The discussion also touches on historical legal arguments, state tactics to delay constitutional rulings, the potential role of the Supreme Court, and ways for supporters to aid the CRPA in their legal efforts.
This video analyzes a case from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing it demonstrates the court's negative stance towards gun owners and Second Amendment rights. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law uses a specific case originating in Hawaii to illustrate this point, noting that previous courts have found the law untenable. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on the issue and provides resources for further information and legal consultation.
This video breaks down the Ninth Circuit's ruling in Rhode v. Bonta, which declared California's ammunition background check system unconstitutional. CRPA President Chuck Michel explains how Proposition 63 became a rights-restricting law, why the court labeled it a "background check scheme," and discusses the potential next steps, including en banc review or a Supreme Court appeal. The discussion highlights the ongoing impact of the Bruen decision on Second Amendment law and what this legal victory means for gun rights in California.
This YouTube video discusses the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' En Banc Panel decision in the Duncan v. Bonta case, a legal battle concerning firearms that has been ongoing for nearly 10 years. The opinion was issued with a 7-4 vote. The video also features a link to a dissent video by Judge VanDyke and promotes Attorneys on Retainer, offering a discount with a specific code. A disclaimer states the content is for educational and entertainment purposes only and not legal advice, with the creator identifying as "NOT" a lawyer. Affiliate links and paid advertisements may be present.
This video discusses the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals denying an En Banc review for the May v. Bonta case. CRPA President Chuck Michel provides insights and analysis, especially from his presence at Shot Show. The discussion touches on the evolution of Second Amendment law and what the next steps might be in the legal fight. The video encourages viewers to join CRPA to support their ongoing efforts.
This YouTube video discusses a significant legal victory for Second Amendment rights, where 13 out of 15 circuit court judges ruled in favor of restoring the rights of an individual named Mr. Range. The Third Circuit En Banc panel's opinion is highlighted as a potential path to further successes for gun rights advocates. The description also includes promotional links for "Attorneys on Retainer" with a discount code, a "Constitution Book," and merchandise, along with social media links. A clear disclaimer states the content is opinions, not legal advice, and for educational/entertainment purposes.
This video discusses the Ninth Circuit's split decision in the May v. Bonta case concerning "sensitive" locations for firearm restrictions under SB2. The court introduced a new, confusing definition of "sensitive" locations, leading to about half of them being upheld. The Second Amendment Foundation (2AF) has requested an en banc rehearing of the case. The video also promotes Attorneys on Retainer with a discount code and links to a constitution book and the creator's merchandise and social media. A disclaimer states the content is opinion, not legal advice.
This YouTube video discusses a significant legal development for Second Amendment rights. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned a previous pro-2A decision in the United States v. Duarte case, opting to rehear the case En Banc. The video highlights the court's repeated reversals and includes commentary from a dissenting judge who likens the situation to 'Groundhog Day'. The description also includes promotional links for legal services, a constitution book, and channel merchandise, alongside disclaimers about legal advice and affiliate links. The content is presented for educational and entertainment purposes.
This YouTube video, titled "Enough is Enough! It's Time for an Injunction!", discusses legal actions concerning firearms, specifically referencing "2571". The content focuses on the legal track of a lawsuit through the courts, including the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and the concept of "en banc" review. It aims to inform viewers about the ongoing fight for Second Amendment rights and encourages support for organizations like the CRPA. Sponsors like CCW Safe and the Police Credit Union are also highlighted.
