This video discusses "malum prohibitum" crimes and how they pose a danger to a free society, drawing a parallel to the ATF's actions that could result in harm to pets, exemplified by the "Peanut The Squirrel Killed" segment. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith explains the difference between malum prohibitum (wrong because it's prohibited) and malum in se (wrong in itself) crimes. Smith also touches on the importance of legal representation and the "four boxes" of American liberty: the soap box, ballot box, jury box, and ammunition box. The Four Boxes Diner channel focuses on Second Amendment news and analysis from a constitutional lawyer's perspective, referencing Mark Smith's books and legal scholarship.
This video argues against AR-15 bans by framing them as "malum prohibitum" (wrong because it's prohibited) rather than "malum in se" (wrong in itself). It references a Harvard Law & Public Policy article by Mark W. Smith and a decision by Judge Benitez, suggesting that such bans are unconstitutional and hypocritical. The video touches on marijuana laws as another example of "malum prohibitum" and emphasizes understanding the "four boxes" of American liberty to defend rights.
You've reached the end! 2 videos loaded.
