This video analyzes the Supreme Court's decision in Rahimi, highlighting it as a significant loss for Attorney General Merrick Garland and the anti-gun movement. The "text first, history second" approach to Second Amendment cases was upheld, preventing the destruction of gun rights as Garland and the DOJ intended. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith details the ruling, discussing why Rahimi was a difficult case to win, touching on the 14th Amendment and due process issues. The video notes the narrowness of the ruling and Justice Jackson's concurrence, which is interpreted as an admission of defeat. The content aims to educate viewers on Bill of Rights issues and defense of liberty.
This video provides an initial reaction to the US v. Rahimi Supreme Court decision concerning the Second Amendment. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith analyzes the ruling, emphasizing how the Biden administration's attempt to undermine the Second Amendment and the Bruen methodology, through a case with 'terrible facts,' ultimately failed. The content aims to educate viewers on Bill of Rights news and analysis, drawing parallels to the 'four boxes' of American liberty.
This video discusses a new ATF rule expanding background checks for firearm sales, aiming to circumvent Congress. The rule, influenced by the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, requires federal registration and background checks for anyone selling firearms predominantly for profit. This change potentially criminalizes individuals who profit from selling their own firearms. The description also includes promotional content for merchandise and hearing protection from the channel's store.
This video criticizes the Biden administration's approach to violent crime, specifically highlighting Attorney General Merrick Garland's statements. The creator finds the administration's claims of lowering crime laughable, suggesting it's a desperate political maneuver. The video implies a disconnect between official narratives and perceived reality regarding crime rates.
This video analyzes the US Department of Justice's 600-page report on law enforcement failures during the Uvalde school shooting. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith critiques Merrick Garland's response and discusses the report's findings on police errors. The analysis also touches upon the purpose of the Second Amendment, using an Israeli example, and emphasizes the importance of understanding the "four boxes" of American liberty: the soap box, ballot box, jury box, and ammunition box. The content highlights the need for citizens to be their own first responders and advocates for Second Amendment rights.
This video discusses a significant US Supreme Court order regarding the case 'Range v. Garland,' which challenges a federal gun control statute (18 USC 922(g)(1)) pertaining to non-violent felons' firearm rights. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith from Four Boxes Diner breaks down the implications of the Court's decision to conference the case, suggesting it causes concern for Attorney General Merrick Garland and the Department of Justice. The analysis delves into the legal arguments, historical context, and potential outcomes of the case, highlighting the importance of understanding Second Amendment rights.
This video features Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner discussing a legal strategy to counter potential Second Amendment restrictions. He outlines how to prevent the Biden administration and Merrick Garland from using the Zackey Rahimi case to erode Second Amendment rights, specifically in the context of the NYSRPA v. Bruen Supreme Court decision. The video also emphasizes ensuring Rahimi faces appropriate legal consequences while defending constitutional gun rights, framing the approach as a "win-win" scenario. Smith draws parallels to historical left-wing tactics and references his own work and legal scholarship.
This video analyzes the Department of Justice's claims of "a million acts of domestic violence" annually in the context of the Supreme Court's Rahimi case and the constitutionality of 18 USC 922g8. The creator, Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner, scrutinizes the data presented by the DOJ, suggesting it is largely hyperbolic. The analysis delves into the list of prohibited persons and the low conviction rates associated with this specific statute, comparing it to the more frequently used felon prohibitor. The video also explores the motivations behind Attorney General Merrick Garland's stance.
This video announces and discusses a significant legal development: the NRA has filed a lawsuit against the ATF, DOJ, Steven Dettlebach, and Merrick Garland. The description highlights that the NRA is following the legal precedent set by other gun rights organizations like FPC, GOA, and the Second Amendment Foundation. The lawsuit is likely related to firearms regulations, specifically mentioning "pistol brace rule" from the reference article. This is a breaking news event for the firearms community.
This video discusses the U.S. Supreme Court granting a writ of certiorari to hear the *US v. Rahimi* case. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith analyzes the case, which was requested by Biden's Attorney General Merrick Garland. The speaker suggests this development may not be favorable for Second Amendment rights, emphasizing the need for time to observe the outcome. The video also highlights the expertise of Mark W. Smith, noting his legal background and past work, and promotes the 'four boxes' of American liberty.
This video discusses a breaking report where the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Merrick Garland are reportedly requesting an expedited hearing from the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) to reverse a pro-gun decision originating from the 5th Circuit Court. The content aims to inform viewers about this significant legal development impacting gun rights, encouraging discussion and analysis of the implications.
This video features Washington Gun Law President William Kirk discussing Montana Governor Greg Gianforte's firm stance against the ATF's new pistol brace rule. The discussion centers on the governor's communication with Attorney General Merrick Garland and a Montana state statute that signals non-cooperation with federal attempts to infringe on Second Amendment rights. The content emphasizes education and understanding the implications of this legislative action for gun owners.
