Videos tagged with Rahimi Decision

This video breaks down a significant Second Amendment legal development where an Appeals Court relied on the Supreme Court's Rahimi decision to rule in favor of gun rights. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith of Four Boxes Diner discusses the case background, how Rahimi was used to support non-violent felons' Second Amendment rights, the role of dicta, and the court's criticism of prosecutors. The analysis highlights why this ruling is important for the broader landscape of Second Amendment precedent, especially in post-Bruen litigation.

This video analyzes the Supreme Court's Rahimi decision, with constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith of Four Boxes Diner providing insights that he believes are being overlooked by some within the Second Amendment community. Smith, a Supreme Court Bar member and author, discusses the implications of the ruling from a legal and constitutional perspective, drawing on his expertise to interpret the "four boxes" of American liberty: the soap box, ballot box, jury box, and ammunition box. The content aims to equip viewers with the knowledge to defend their rights.

This video features Professor Mark W. Smith addressing the Federalist Society on the significant SCOTUS Rahimi decision and its implications for Second Amendment jurisprudence. Drawing on his expertise as a constitutional attorney, Supreme Court Bar member, and frequent Fox News guest, Smith analyzes the case's impact on gun rights. The video, published with permission from the Federalist Society, aims to inform viewers about the evolving legal landscape of the Second Amendment, emphasizing the importance of understanding the "four boxes" of American liberty. Smith's background includes authoring books on gun rights and his scholarship has been cited in significant legal challenges to gun control measures.

This Week in Guns covers significant legal and administrative developments affecting firearm owners. Key topics include the overturning of Chevron deference and its potential impact on future gun regulations, the implications of the Rahimi decision for gun restrictions, and a positive update on significantly reduced ATF Form 4 approval times for suppressors and NFA items. The episode also touches on political commentary, the presidential debate, and a Surgeon General's report on firearm violence.

This video features attorney Chuck Michel discussing the pros and cons of the SCOTUS Rahimi decision. The content focuses on legal and Second Amendment implications related to firearms ownership and domestic violence restraining orders. It aims to inform viewers about the potential impact of this Supreme Court ruling on gun rights.

This YouTube video analyzes the Supreme Court's Rahimi decision, focusing on Justice Brett Kavanaugh's concurring opinion. The video highlights that while the case concerned the disarmament of individuals under restraining orders, Kavanaugh's opinion delves into broader constitutional scrutiny approaches for vague provisions. The content creator believes this aspect of the opinion holds significant implications for future legal battles concerning constitutional interpretation.

This video analyzes the Supreme Court's decision in Rahimi, highlighting it as a significant loss for Attorney General Merrick Garland and the anti-gun movement. The "text first, history second" approach to Second Amendment cases was upheld, preventing the destruction of gun rights as Garland and the DOJ intended. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith details the ruling, discussing why Rahimi was a difficult case to win, touching on the 14th Amendment and due process issues. The video notes the narrowness of the ruling and Justice Jackson's concurrence, which is interpreted as an admission of defeat. The content aims to educate viewers on Bill of Rights issues and defense of liberty.

This video discusses the Supreme Court's ruling in the Rahimi case and its implications for the Second Amendment. It features commentary from Clarence Thomas, highlighting his "destruction" of the opinion against gun rights. The description includes various links for viewers to support the channel, join gun rights organizations, and purchase products. It also provides extensive disclaimers regarding the content's educational and entertainment purpose, emphasizing safe practices.

This video analyzes the Supreme Court's Rahimi decision and its potential impact on other legal cases. It features quotes from the decision and a statement from the CRPA, followed by final thoughts. The description also includes calls to action for viewers to support CRPA and consider CCW Safe for self-defense coverage, as well as a mention of the Police Credit Union for CRPA members.