YouTube Gun Channel Ban | YouTube Anti-Gun Policy Part 2

This YouTube video is titled 'Fed Boy Doesn’t Want Hush Tubes'. The description is blank. Based solely on the title, the video likely discusses firearms and potentially accessories or modifications, with a focus on suppression systems ('Hush Tubes'). The term 'Fed Boy' suggests a commentary or opinion piece, possibly relating to regulations or perceived overreach concerning firearm components.

This video critiques California's comprehensive gun control laws following a mass shooting at a children's birthday party. The presenter argues that despite having numerous regulations like red flag laws, magazine bans, and assault weapon bans, such violence still occurs. The video analyzes the event, including gang involvement and news footage, to demonstrate why the state's approach, which the author believes disarms law-abiding citizens while failing to deter criminals, is ineffective. It advocates for an alternative perspective on gun control's failure, suggesting it's not a matter of strength but of fundamental ineffectiveness. The description also promotes a Cyber Monday sale on merchandise related to Second Amendment rights and tactical gear.

This video discusses the immediate aftermath of a Supreme Court decision impacting suppressor ownership. The description highlights a surge in customer activity at local gun stores, with shelves for suppressors becoming notably depleted. The presenter aims to explain the reasons behind this increased demand, suggesting it's driven by shooters, hunters, and new gun owners responding to the court's ruling regarding suppressors as protected arms.

This video analyzes the recent collapse of four significant gun-control initiatives in California. The creator argues that these proposed laws failed not due to media attention, but because they were deeply flawed attempts to circumvent the implications of the Bruen decision. The video aims to expose California's 'anti-gun playbook' and discuss how the failure of these bills could positively impact gun rights advocacy nationwide.

This video discusses firearm magazine capacity restrictions in various US states, focusing on the common limitation of 10 rounds. It explores the legal implications and practical considerations for firearm owners affected by these laws. The content likely touches upon different types of firearms and their compatibility with these capacity limits.

This video analyzes a disturbing incident in Australia where police allegedly failed to respond for nearly 20 minutes during a mass shooting involving two gunmen, despite being on the scene. The content criticizes Australia's strict gun control measures, arguing that disarming citizens leaves them vulnerable when law enforcement is unable to provide immediate protection. It emphasizes the importance of self-defense and prepared courage. The video also promotes the creator's FAFO merchandise and AKT1 Blackouts hearing protection.

This video discusses the Supreme Court's relisting of the Duncan v. Bonta case, analyzing what this might signify for Second Amendment rights in early 2026. CRPA President Chuck Michel provides insights into the case's momentum, its place among numerous pending 2A cases, and potential outcomes, including implications for California gun laws and magazine bans. The discussion touches on the Court's potential frustration with lower courts ignoring Bruen decisions and highlights the importance of public engagement and CRPA membership for advocacy.

This video discusses an impending ammunition shortage and advises gun owners on essential calibers to stock up on for 2025. It highlights that the current demand for ammunition is beyond typical weekend shooters, suggesting a significant market shift. The content aims to guide viewers on which calibers to prioritize before prices increase and availability decreases, emphasizing the need for proactive stocking. The creator encourages likes and subscriptions to reach a milestone of 200k subscribers and provides links to their YouTube and Facebook channels.

This video discusses the legal case of Gardner v. Maryland, where an individual's freedom was allegedly jeopardized by Maryland's gun laws while defending herself. The Second Amendment Foundation has joined Ms. Gardner's cause, highlighting the compelling facts of the case. The presenter encourages viewers to educate themselves on these issues and provides links to relevant legal documents, the Second Amendment Foundation, and a self-defense protection service called Right to Bear. The video also includes calls to action for submitting video ideas and subscribing to newsletters and social media channels.

This video analyzes the recent changes to California's Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) regulations following the passage of SB 2. It discusses how the Department of Justice (DOJ) implemented emergency rules without significant public input, and how these have now transitioned into formally adopted CCW regulations. The content focuses on the legal and regulatory landscape affecting firearm owners in California.