How the Supreme Court Just Boxed in the EPA, and What That Means for the ATF
William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, analyzes the Supreme Court's decision in West Virginia v. EPA, drawing parallels between the EPA's overreach and the ATF's alleged legislative overstepping. He argues that the EPA's "major questions doctrine" ruling, which limits agency authority to areas explicitly granted by Congress, has significant implications for ATF regulations. Specifically, Kirk highlights the ATF's pistol brace rule, rulings on Rare Breed Triggers, and regulations concerning solvent traps, receivers, and 80% lowers as potentially unconstitutional under this precedent. The video encourages lawful gun owners to educate themselves on these legal challenges.












