PROFESSOR SMITH DEBUNKS NEW ANTI-GUN ATTACK ON 2A AND THE SUPREME COURT
This video features constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith debunking recent criticisms of the Supreme Court's decision in NYSRPA v. Bruen. Smith, a prominent Second Amendment advocate and author, explains how the ruling addresses a flawed "two-step process" previously used by anti-gun judges to circumvent Second Amendment protections. He details the methodology established in the Heller case and clarifies how Bruen rectifies issues that allowed for the banning of firearms. The analysis aims to equip gun owners with the knowledge to counter future anti-gun arguments and defend Second Amendment rights.










