What's at STAKE on DEC 4th? 9th Circuit hears Rhode v. Bonta Arguments

This video breaks down the key legal arguments in Sanchez v. Bonta, a Ninth Circuit case challenging California's ban on firearm suppressors. It discusses CRPA's involvement, the court's request for expert counsel, and the oral arguments, focusing on the state's 'not an arm' defense and the potential impact on Second Amendment rights post-Bruen. The analysis explores whether suppressors are protected under the Second Amendment and forecasts potential outcomes for 2026. It also touches on the broader landscape of Second Amendment litigation and shifts under the Trump DOJ.

This video from CRPA analyzes the Duncan v. Bonta legal decision in California, focusing on how the state is redefining the term 'dangerous' in relation to firearms. It argues that this redefinition conflicts with Supreme Court precedents like Heller and Bruen, potentially infringing on Second Amendment rights. The discussion highlights how the state is attempting to disregard the protection of commonly possessed arms and arms used for protected activities like marksmanship.

This video provides a comprehensive recap of the 2025 legislative year in California concerning firearm laws. It details significant anti-Second Amendment proposals, unexpected pro-2A developments, and the impact of grassroots advocacy, Capitol Days, and direct engagement with lawmakers. CRPA's Legislative Director, Rick Travis, breaks down how specific bills gained national controversy and highlights the importance of understanding legislative processes for future advocacy efforts. The session's key victories and defeats are analyzed, offering insights for Californians preparing for the 2026 session.

This video analyzes the critical juncture of the Duncan v. Bonta case as it reaches the U.S. Supreme Court's conference. CRPA President Chuck Michel explains the significance of the conference, the factors Justices consider, and how Duncan compares to other Second Amendment petitions like Wolford and the marijuana-possession case. The discussion highlights the unprecedented activity on the Supreme Court's firearms docket in modern history and explores the need for clearer guidance following the Bruen decision, potential outcomes for Duncan, and judicial resistance in lower courts. It also encourages viewers to support CRPA.

This video analyzes the Ninth Circuit's decision in Roe v. Bonta, a California ammunition background check case. It discusses the court's vote for en banc rehearing, which vacated a previous pro-Second Amendment ruling. CRPA President Chuck Michel explains the implications of this decision, the state's motivations, and how the Bruen framework applies. The video also touches on the Ninth Circuit's history of alleged bias, the broader national impact on ammunition laws, and upcoming related cases like Duncan v. Bonta, highlighting the stakes for California gun owners and the potential reshaping of Second Amendment law on the West Coast.

This video appears to be a highly opinionated and politically charged commentary related to firearms, gun control, and legal matters. The title references "INSANE" content, suggesting a strong emotional reaction to events or policies. Key entities like #congress, #langley, #goa (Gun Owners of America), #atf (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives), and #bondi (likely referencing a political figure) point towards discussions about legislative action, government agencies, and advocacy groups. The inclusion of #scotus (Supreme Court of the United States) and #jailtime indicates a potential focus on legal rulings, penalties, or infringements on rights. The hashtags suggest a critical perspective on current events impacting gun ownership and the Second Amendment.

This video from CRPA analyzes the Duncan v. Bonta legal decision in California, focusing on how the state is redefining the term 'dangerous' in relation to firearms. It argues that this redefinition conflicts with Supreme Court precedents like Heller and Bruen, potentially infringing on Second Amendment rights. The discussion highlights how the state is attempting to disregard the protection of commonly possessed arms and arms used for protected activities like marksmanship.

This video provides a comprehensive recap of the 2025 legislative year in California concerning firearm laws. It details significant anti-Second Amendment proposals, unexpected pro-2A developments, and the impact of grassroots advocacy, Capitol Days, and direct engagement with lawmakers. CRPA's Legislative Director, Rick Travis, breaks down how specific bills gained national controversy and highlights the importance of understanding legislative processes for future advocacy efforts. The session's key victories and defeats are analyzed, offering insights for Californians preparing for the 2026 session.

This video analyzes California's 'no split' argument against Supreme Court review of its magazine ban. The content refutes the claim by highlighting existing circuit splits on crucial Second Amendment sub-issues concerning what constitutes protected 'arms' (magazines, suppressors, bump stocks) and the required historical analogs for gun regulations. This creates the exact type of conflict the Supreme Court is meant to address, challenging California's legal maneuver.

This video discusses the potential impact of the Supreme Court's decision in the Duncan v. Bonta case on California's ban on commonly owned firearm magazines. The CRPA (California Rifle and Pistol Association) is pushing back against the ban, arguing that it infringes upon the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens by forcing them to surrender lawfully acquired property. The case questions whether governments have the authority to ban widely owned arms and compel citizens to divest themselves of their possessions.

This video discusses a controversial incident where an armed homeowner was arrested after shooting teenagers attempting to steal packages. It explores the complex legal and societal issues surrounding property crime, lack of enforcement, and the pressure on law-abiding citizens. The content aims to provoke thought on how such situations arise when criminal deterrence is perceived as absent and emphasizes the need for individuals to be prepared for self-defense. Promotional content for the creator's merchandise and the USCCA is also included.

This video title suggests a geopolitical or military discussion, likely focusing on an event where American lives were lost. The phrase "Three Americans KIA for What?" implies an investigation into the reasons or justification behind these casualties. The "IMMEDIATE RELEASE" tag indicates a breaking news or urgent update context. Without a transcript or further description, the specific firearms, calibers, manufacturers, or detailed topics are unknown. The content likely revolves around military actions, foreign policy, or conflict analysis, with potential implications for defense discussions.

This video analyzes commentary from Democratic strategists regarding Jasmine Crockett's Senate run. The discussion suggests internal party concerns and strategic critiques, focusing on themes of political maneuvering and campaign viability. The provided description includes a link to a reference article and a fair use declaration. It also promotes a sponsor for a non-cancellable commerce platform.

This video addresses a critical scenario for lawful gun owners: what to say when law enforcement asks about their firearm. The creator emphasizes that an incorrect response can escalate a situation and lead to arrest. The content aims to provide specific, actionable phrases that will protect an armed citizen's freedom and prevent them from being wrongfully accused. It highlights common pitfalls that lead lawful carriers into trouble and offers a simple, effective sentence to navigate these encounters.