California 9th Circuit “Assault Weapons” Not Protected By Constitution Miller v. Bonta
This video provides commentary on the oral arguments presented in the Miller v. Bonta case at the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, focusing on California's arguments that 'assault weapons' are not protected by the Constitution. The presenter discusses the legal interpretations and plain text arguments made by both California and the plaintiffs regarding firearms rights. The content is explicitly stated as opinion and not legal advice. The video also includes promotional links for merchandise and social media.









