CRPA Is Now Officially Training DOJ-Certified CCW Instructors

This video discusses the Supreme Court's relisting of the Duncan v. Bonta case, analyzing what this might signify for Second Amendment rights in early 2026. CRPA President Chuck Michel provides insights into the case's momentum, its place among numerous pending 2A cases, and potential outcomes, including implications for California gun laws and magazine bans. The discussion touches on the Court's potential frustration with lower courts ignoring Bruen decisions and highlights the importance of public engagement and CRPA membership for advocacy.

This video analyzes the recent changes to California's Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) regulations following the passage of SB 2. It discusses how the Department of Justice (DOJ) implemented emergency rules without significant public input, and how these have now transitioned into formally adopted CCW regulations. The content focuses on the legal and regulatory landscape affecting firearm owners in California.

This video analyzes California's Senate Bill 2 (SB 2) and its impact on Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) classes. The bill not only established 'sensitive places' for CCW holders but also led to Department of Justice regulations concerning who can teach CCW courses. The content highlights ongoing litigation, with CRPA achieving successes on the 'sensitive places' aspect and the Wolford case currently before the Supreme Court. The primary focus is the developing controversy surrounding the qualifications and designation of CCW instructors.

This video discusses California's Proposition 63, which aimed to ban magazines over ten rounds. It explains how the Duncan v. Bonta lawsuit, supported by the CRPA, has protected the legal ownership of these magazines, including those acquired during "Freedom Week." The content focuses on the legal battles and ongoing efforts to defend Second Amendment rights regarding firearm magazines in California.

This video from CRPA analyzes the Duncan v. Bonta legal decision in California, focusing on how the state is redefining the term 'dangerous' in relation to firearms. It argues that this redefinition conflicts with Supreme Court precedents like Heller and Bruen, potentially infringing on Second Amendment rights. The discussion highlights how the state is attempting to disregard the protection of commonly possessed arms and arms used for protected activities like marksmanship.

This video analyzes California's 'no split' argument against Supreme Court review of its magazine ban. The content refutes the claim by highlighting existing circuit splits on crucial Second Amendment sub-issues concerning what constitutes protected 'arms' (magazines, suppressors, bump stocks) and the required historical analogs for gun regulations. This creates the exact type of conflict the Supreme Court is meant to address, challenging California's legal maneuver.

This video discusses the Supreme Court's relisting of the Duncan v. Bonta case, analyzing what this might signify for Second Amendment rights in early 2026. CRPA President Chuck Michel provides insights into the case's momentum, its place among numerous pending 2A cases, and potential outcomes, including implications for California gun laws and magazine bans. The discussion touches on the Court's potential frustration with lower courts ignoring Bruen decisions and highlights the importance of public engagement and CRPA membership for advocacy.

This video analyzes the recent changes to California's Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) regulations following the passage of SB 2. It discusses how the Department of Justice (DOJ) implemented emergency rules without significant public input, and how these have now transitioned into formally adopted CCW regulations. The content focuses on the legal and regulatory landscape affecting firearm owners in California.

This video analyzes California's Senate Bill 2 (SB 2) and its impact on Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) classes. The bill not only established 'sensitive places' for CCW holders but also led to Department of Justice regulations concerning who can teach CCW courses. The content highlights ongoing litigation, with CRPA achieving successes on the 'sensitive places' aspect and the Wolford case currently before the Supreme Court. The primary focus is the developing controversy surrounding the qualifications and designation of CCW instructors.

This video explores the possibility of the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) consolidating multiple Second Amendment cases, including Duncan v. Bonta, into a single 'Second Amendment Day.' The discussion centers on the court potentially addressing these cases together to review and potentially overturn lower court decisions that are perceived as evading the *Bruen* standard, which significantly impacts gun rights.

This YouTube video is a live podcast episode titled "The 'MURCA! Guns & Freedom Podcast!". The description indicates the stream will go live at 6 PM Pacific and includes a promotional link for StreamYard, offering a discount for new streamers. The content is likely to focus on firearms, freedom, and potentially related political or cultural topics, given the title. The podcast format suggests discussion and commentary rather than demonstrations.

This video announces a significant development for the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA). Following the finalization of California's SB 2 regulations, the CRPA has officially been authorized to provide training credentials for individuals seeking to become Department of Justice (DOJ)-certified CCW instructors. This new authorization means that CRPA-certified instructors will be qualified to teach the mandatory CCW courses throughout California, joining other specified firearms instructors such as POST-certified instructors.

This YouTube video from God Family and Guns (GFG) claims the ATF is actively monitoring specific gun purchases and has proof. The video encourages viewer support through Patreon and promotes various sponsors and merchandise. It touches on prayer requests and directs viewers to other GFG social media channels. The core of the video appears to be a warning about ATF surveillance of gun owners.

This video discusses the immediate impact of a Supreme Court decision that apparently reclassified suppressors as protected arms. The description highlights a surge in demand at gun stores, leading to empty shelves, particularly for suppressors. The content aims to explain the widespread effect on shooters, hunters, and new gun owners across the country.