Unprecedented! Duncan v Bonta Skips 3 Judge Panel!

This video analyzes California's 'no split' argument against Supreme Court review of its magazine ban. The content refutes the claim by highlighting existing circuit splits on crucial Second Amendment sub-issues concerning what constitutes protected 'arms' (magazines, suppressors, bump stocks) and the required historical analogs for gun regulations. This creates the exact type of conflict the Supreme Court is meant to address, challenging California's legal maneuver.

This video discusses the potential impact of the Supreme Court's decision in the Duncan v. Bonta case on California's ban on commonly owned firearm magazines. The CRPA (California Rifle and Pistol Association) is pushing back against the ban, arguing that it infringes upon the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens by forcing them to surrender lawfully acquired property. The case questions whether governments have the authority to ban widely owned arms and compel citizens to divest themselves of their possessions.

This video appears to be a short-form content piece addressing political and legal aspects surrounding firearms, likely related to gun control legislation and court decisions. The hashtags suggest a discussion involving Congress, government agencies like the ATF, and potentially judicial bodies such as SCOTUS. The mention of 'jail time' implies a focus on the consequences of firearm-related actions or policies. While no specific firearms are mentioned, the context firmly places it within the broader firearms discourse and Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses a lawsuit initiated by the Department of Justice (DOJ) targeting several states for allegedly maintaining inaccurate voter rolls. The lawsuit aims to ensure the integrity of elections by correcting voter registration data. The video mentions the use of fair use for content and promotes a sponsor specializing in e-commerce platforms for regulated industries.

This video discusses California's Proposition 63, which aimed to ban magazines over ten rounds. It explains how the Duncan v. Bonta lawsuit, supported by the CRPA, has protected the legal ownership of these magazines, including those acquired during "Freedom Week." The content focuses on the legal battles and ongoing efforts to defend Second Amendment rights regarding firearm magazines in California.

This video breaks down the key legal arguments in Sanchez v. Bonta, a Ninth Circuit case challenging California's ban on firearm suppressors. It discusses CRPA's involvement, the court's request for expert counsel, and the oral arguments, focusing on the state's 'not an arm' defense and the potential impact on Second Amendment rights post-Bruen. The analysis explores whether suppressors are protected under the Second Amendment and forecasts potential outcomes for 2026. It also touches on the broader landscape of Second Amendment litigation and shifts under the Trump DOJ.

This video explores the possibility of the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) consolidating multiple Second Amendment cases, including Duncan v. Bonta, into a single 'Second Amendment Day.' The discussion centers on the court potentially addressing these cases together to review and potentially overturn lower court decisions that are perceived as evading the *Bruen* standard, which significantly impacts gun rights.

This video discusses California's Proposition 63, which aimed to ban magazines over ten rounds. It explains how the Duncan v. Bonta lawsuit, supported by the CRPA, has protected the legal ownership of these magazines, including those acquired during "Freedom Week." The content focuses on the legal battles and ongoing efforts to defend Second Amendment rights regarding firearm magazines in California.

This video from CRPA analyzes the Duncan v. Bonta legal decision in California, focusing on how the state is redefining the term 'dangerous' in relation to firearms. It argues that this redefinition conflicts with Supreme Court precedents like Heller and Bruen, potentially infringing on Second Amendment rights. The discussion highlights how the state is attempting to disregard the protection of commonly possessed arms and arms used for protected activities like marksmanship.

This video provides a comprehensive recap of the 2025 legislative year in California concerning firearm laws. It details significant anti-Second Amendment proposals, unexpected pro-2A developments, and the impact of grassroots advocacy, Capitol Days, and direct engagement with lawmakers. CRPA's Legislative Director, Rick Travis, breaks down how specific bills gained national controversy and highlights the importance of understanding legislative processes for future advocacy efforts. The session's key victories and defeats are analyzed, offering insights for Californians preparing for the 2026 session.

This video explores the possibility of the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) consolidating multiple Second Amendment cases, including Duncan v. Bonta, into a single 'Second Amendment Day.' The discussion centers on the court potentially addressing these cases together to review and potentially overturn lower court decisions that are perceived as evading the *Bruen* standard, which significantly impacts gun rights.

This video discusses a recent filing by the Department of Justice (DOJ) that the uploader believes is a declaration of war on gun owners. The uploader expresses surprise, as they anticipated a more pro-2A stance from the DOJ. The filing is described as "wild" and has caused significant concern among gun owners, prompting a strong reaction from the community. The video likely aims to inform viewers about this development and its potential implications for Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses significant shifts and changes occurring with ammunition availability and pricing in America. It touches upon current trends, potential reasons for these changes, and likely impacts on firearm owners. The description also highlights the creator's mission and encourages viewer support through Patreon, merchandise, and prayer requests, while promoting their other social media channels.

This video analyzes the 2024 Sydney Bondi Junction stabbing, questioning Australia's strict gun control laws and arguing that they fail to prevent determined attackers from committing mass violence. The content highlights that laws do not deter individuals intent on murder, as evidenced by the attacker obtaining firearms and improvised explosives. It further discusses the limitations of "low gun death" statistics, the shift in violence tools rather than intent, the burden on unarmed civilians, and the government's monopoly on force. The creator advocates for the capability of law-abiding citizens for self-defense, promoting a "FAFO" (F*** Around, Find Out) mindset of preparedness.