Already Licensed, Already Regulated—So Why More Gun Show Rules?

This video analyzes California's 'no split' argument against Supreme Court review of its magazine ban. The content refutes the claim by highlighting existing circuit splits on crucial Second Amendment sub-issues concerning what constitutes protected 'arms' (magazines, suppressors, bump stocks) and the required historical analogs for gun regulations. This creates the exact type of conflict the Supreme Court is meant to address, challenging California's legal maneuver.

This video announces a significant development for the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA). Following the finalization of California's SB 2 regulations, the CRPA has officially been authorized to provide training credentials for individuals seeking to become Department of Justice (DOJ)-certified CCW instructors. This new authorization means that CRPA-certified instructors will be qualified to teach the mandatory CCW courses throughout California, joining other specified firearms instructors such as POST-certified instructors.

This video discusses California's Proposition 63, which aimed to ban magazines over ten rounds. It explains how the Duncan v. Bonta lawsuit, supported by the CRPA, has protected the legal ownership of these magazines, including those acquired during "Freedom Week." The content focuses on the legal battles and ongoing efforts to defend Second Amendment rights regarding firearm magazines in California.

This video discusses the potential impact of the Supreme Court's decision in the Duncan v. Bonta case on California's ban on commonly owned firearm magazines. The CRPA (California Rifle and Pistol Association) is pushing back against the ban, arguing that it infringes upon the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens by forcing them to surrender lawfully acquired property. The case questions whether governments have the authority to ban widely owned arms and compel citizens to divest themselves of their possessions.

This video discusses the immediate impact of California's AB 2571 legislation, which effectively halted youth shooting activities. The description highlights how ranges removed manufacturer banners and junior programs were frozen due to fear of substantial fines for 'advertising to minors.' This legislation is presented as a cultural crackdown that stopped safety and heritage programs, pending court intervention.

This video analyzes California's Assembly Bill 2571, focusing on its implications for the firearms industry. The bill, dubbed the "junior marketing" ban, targets entities like the CRPA, youth-focused firearm publications, and manufacturers. It prohibits advertisements for guns, ammunition, or accessories deemed "reasonably attractive to minors," citing aspects like bright colors, youth images, or mascots. The description argues that this vague standard could stifle lawful speech and youth safety education efforts.

This video provides a comprehensive recap of significant Second Amendment litigation in California for 2025, with CRPA at the forefront. It details lawsuits filed, victories secured, and cases heading towards critical 2026 decisions, including challenges in federal courts and potentially the U.S. Supreme Court. Topics covered include CCW fees, suppressor bans, sensitive places, FFL surveillance, gun roster challenges, youth advertising bans, gun show bans, ammo background checks, and updates on major cases like Duncan and Rhode. The video aims to inform Californians about the ongoing legal battles shaping gun rights in the state and encourages viewers to become CRPA members.

This video from CRPA outlines the pathway to becoming a California DOJ-recognized CCW instructor. It details a three-course program covering pistol instruction, personal protection inside the home, and personal protection outside the home. The goal is to equip individuals to teach concealed carry courses in California, emphasizing the necessary qualifications and training.

This video announces a significant development for the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA). Following the finalization of California's SB 2 regulations, the CRPA has officially been authorized to provide training credentials for individuals seeking to become Department of Justice (DOJ)-certified CCW instructors. This new authorization means that CRPA-certified instructors will be qualified to teach the mandatory CCW courses throughout California, joining other specified firearms instructors such as POST-certified instructors.

This video discusses the Supreme Court's relisting of the Duncan v. Bonta case, analyzing what this might signify for Second Amendment rights in early 2026. CRPA President Chuck Michel provides insights into the case's momentum, its place among numerous pending 2A cases, and potential outcomes, including implications for California gun laws and magazine bans. The discussion touches on the Court's potential frustration with lower courts ignoring Bruen decisions and highlights the importance of public engagement and CRPA membership for advocacy.

This video, titled "ULTIMATE FAFO: Judge Who Released Immigrant To Evade Feds CONVICTED AND CATCHES PRISON Time," focuses on the legal and judicial consequences faced by a judge who allegedly aided an immigrant in evading federal authorities. The title implies a "Fuck Around And Find Out" scenario, suggesting that the judge's actions led to their own downfall and imprisonment. The video likely discusses the specifics of the case, the charges brought against the judge, and the outcome of the legal proceedings.

This YouTube video, titled "The 'MURCA! Guns & Freedom Podcast!", announces a live Q&A session focused on Second Amendment rights and firearms. The description explicitly states it's a pro-2a Q&A, indicating a strong emphasis on constitutional rights related to gun ownership. The video also includes a promotional link for StreamYard, suggesting it's a livestreamed event for a community interested in these topics.

This video critiques Australia's recent national gun buyback initiative following a mass shooting. The presenter argues that such policies, similar to those implemented in the 1990s, are ineffective and based on a flawed premise of disarming the public as a solution to violence. The video highlights the cyclical nature of these responses, suggesting governments use tragedies to expand control rather than address systemic failures and police response issues. It emphasizes that disarming law-abiding citizens leads to helplessness, not safety, and positions Australia's approach as a warning for other nations.

This video discusses the implications of proposed new regulations for gun shows in California. Matthew D. Cubeiro argues that many of the proposed rules are redundant as they are already covered by existing licensing and FFL/COE requirements. He questions the justification for new regulations based on a 2022 incident, especially when the proposals are being made for late 2025. The importance of public comments from producers and vendors, who have practical industry insights, is highlighted.